Pekrins
Pekrins v. Angulo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARY RONNELL PERKINS, Case No.: 18cv850-DMS-LL
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO EXCLUDE
INFORMATION
C. ANGULO, et al.,
Defendants. [ECF No. 66]
17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Motion to Exclude Information” [ECF 18 No. 66] and Defendants’ Response [ECF No. 68]. For the reasons set forth below, the 19 Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion.
RELEVANT DISCOVERY BACKGROUND
21 The instant motion arises from: (1) Plaintiff’s Requests for Production (“RFPs”) 22 Nos. 5-7; and (2) the Court’s July 13, 2020 Order [ECF No. 55] on Plaintiff’s Motion to 23 Compel [ECF No. 44].
I. Plaintiff’s RFPs Nos. 3-8 and Defendants’ Responses
25 On April 2, 2020, Plaintiff Gary Ronnell Perkins, a prisoner proceeding pro se, 26 served his First Set of Requests for Production (“RFPs”) on Defendants. ECF No. 44 at 27 9-16. Relevant to the instant dispute are Plaintiff’s RFPs Nos. 5-7, which generally 28 1 …