Pekrins

Pekrins v. Angulo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 23, 20203:18-cv-00850California2,367 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARY RONNELL PERKINS, Case No.: 18cv850-DMS-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO EXCLUDE

INFORMATION

C. ANGULO, et al.,

Defendants. [ECF No. 66]

17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Motion to Exclude Information” [ECF 18 No. 66] and Defendants’ Response [ECF No. 68]. For the reasons set forth below, the 19 Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion.

RELEVANT DISCOVERY BACKGROUND

21 The instant motion arises from: (1) Plaintiff’s Requests for Production (“RFPs”) 22 Nos. 5-7; and (2) the Court’s July 13, 2020 Order [ECF No. 55] on Plaintiff’s Motion to 23 Compel [ECF No. 44].

I. Plaintiff’s RFPs Nos. 3-8 and Defendants’ Responses

25 On April 2, 2020, Plaintiff Gary Ronnell Perkins, a prisoner proceeding pro se, 26 served his First Set of Requests for Production (“RFPs”) on Defendants. ECF No. 44 at 27 9-16. Relevant to the instant dispute are Plaintiff’s RFPs Nos. 5-7, which generally 28 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.