Platt

Platt v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 23, 20203:19-cv-00956-JLBCalifornia7,256 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 KARI P., Case No.: 19-cv-00956-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING CROSS-

v. MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

ANDREW M. SAUL,

Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 17 Defendant. 18 [ECF Nos. 13, 14] 19 On May 22, 2019, plaintiff Kari P. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for a period of disability and disability benefits. (ECF No. 1.) Now pending before the Court and ready for decision are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 13, 14.) For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED, and this matter is remanded for further administrative proceedings consistent with this Order. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On April 28, 2016,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.