Carroll

Carroll v. California Department of Corrections

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20203:19-cv-02126California1,082 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ABONILICO CARROLL, Case No. 19-cv-02126-BAS-KSC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER: 12 v. (1) ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

(ECF No. 23) CORRECTIONS, et al.,

AND

Defendants. (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS (ECF No. 16) 18 Plaintiff filed the operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) in this action on 19 June 8, 2020, seeking declaratory relief and monetary damages for an alleged violation of 20 his civil rights alleging a violation of constitutional rights, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 21 (ECF No. 20.) Plaintiff alleges that while he was incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan 22 Correctional Facility (“RJD”), Defendants denied and delayed medical treatment and 23 accommodations in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Specifically, Plaintiff alleges 24 that, when he returned to RJD in a wheelchair after reconstructive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.