Howshar

Howshar v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20203:20-cv-01729California832 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANNY C. HOWSHAR, Case No.: 20cv1729 JM (AHG)

Plaintiff,

v.

CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ CORPORATION; CAESARS LICENSE MOTION TO DISMISS COMPANY, LLC; and HARRAH’S RESORT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Defendants. 18 19 Specially appearing Defendants, the Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians (“the Rincon Band”), and Defendants Caesars Entertainment Corporation and Caesars License Company, LLC, move to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction, 12(b)(3) for improper venue, and 12(b)(7) for failure to include a necessary and indispensable party. (Doc. No. 3.) The Rincon Band states they were erroneously sued as Harrah’s Resort Southern California, which is not a legal entity. The motion is unopposed and the court finds it suitable for submission without oral …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.