Vinck

Vinck v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20203:19-cv-00715-W-LRCalifornia4,519 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

.

5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 || ROSEMARY G. V., Case No.: 3:19-cv-00715-RBM Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

13 || V. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 14 |) ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER ATTORNEY FEES, COSTS, AND

OF SOCIAL SECURITY EXPENSES UNDER THE EQUAL

, ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT Defendant. [Doc. 23] 17 I. INTRODUCTION Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Rosemary Guadalupe V.’s (“Plaintiff’) 20 || petition for attorney fees, costs, and expenses (“Motion”), seeking reimbursement of the ||same from the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Defendant” or ||“Commissioner”).' (Doc. 23.) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) of the Equal Access to Justice Act (““EAJA”), Plaintiff requests attorney’s fees and expenses for a total of 24…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.