Daniels

Daniels v. Fry

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20203:20-cv-02226California579 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIANE DELIAH DANIELS, Case No.: 3:20-cv-02226-WQH-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. DARYL FRY, et. al., Defendants. HAYES, Judge: On November 9, 2020, Plaintiff Diane Deliah Daniels initiated this action by filing a Complaint against Defendants Daryl Fry, Jayson Stebbins, Michael Roddy, John Meyer, Brian Moynihan, Gerald Hassell, Brian Richard, Thomas Gibbons, Gary Kreep, Joel Wohlfeil, William Gore, Mark Milton, Jamie Felix, Casey James, Edward Bishop, David Nisleit, Keneth Medel, Peter Doft, Scott Hildebrand, Timothy Walsh, Jaime Murillo, Elizabeth Chen, and Aledra Retano. (ECF No. 1). The record reflects no further filings in this case. I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request in Forma Pauperis Status All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 27 28 $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.