Doe

Doe v. Steele

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20203:20-cv-01818California3,059 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANE DOE, Case No. 20-cv-1818-MMA (MSB)

Plaintiff,

MOTION GRANTING IN PART

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

PROTECTIVE ORDER AND LEAVE

CISSY STEELE, et al.,

TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY

Defendants. [Doc. No. 4] 16 17 18 Jane Doe (“Plaintiff”) brings this action against multiple Defendants alleging that she was targeted and groomed for “for the sole purpose of sex trafficking her, in violation of the [Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act].” Doc. No. 12 (“FAC”) ¶ 1. Plaintiff now moves for a protective order and leave to proceed anonymously. See Doc. No. 4. A group of Defendants—Diabolic Video Productions, Inc.; Black Ice LTD; Zero Tolerance Entertainment, Inc.; and Third Degree Films (collectively, “Video Defendants”)—have filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s motion. See Doc. No. 16. Plaintiff has not filed a reply. The Court found the matter suitable for determination on the papers 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.