Wiener

Tattersalls LTD. v. Wiener

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 27, 20203:17-cv-01125California465 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TATTERSALLS LTD., Case No.: 3:17-cv-1125-BTM-

KSC

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

STAY

GERALD WIENER, et al.,

Defendants. [ECF Nos. 216, 220, 224, 228] 16 Pending before the Court are a cornucopia of motions centered around the Court’s sanctions order and judgment (ECF Nos. 210, 211) and Diana L. Corteau’s motions for reconsideration. (ECF No. 213.) The Court orders the following. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(d) provides for a stay of the execution of a final judgment when the moving party posts a supersedeas bond. Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(d). The Court, however, has “inherent discretionary authority in setting supersedeas bonds,” Rachel v. Banana Republic, Inc., 831 F.2d 1503, 1505 n.1 (9th Cir. 1987), and may exercise its discretion to “waive the bond requirement if it sees fit.” Townsend v. Holman Consulting Corp., 881 F.2d 788, 796-97 (9th Cir. 1989), vacated on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.