Dixon
Dixon v. XPO Logistics, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANEANNA DIXON, Case No.: 3:18-cv-2743-L-MDD
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
XPO LOGISTICS, LLC, and DOES
JUDGMENT
through 20, inclusive, 15 Defendants.
17 Pending before the Court in this action alleging gender discrimination and 18 retaliation in violation of California Government Code §§ 12900, is Defendants’ motion 19 for summary judgment. The action was removed from state court based on diversity 20 jurisdiction. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral 21 argument. See Civ. L. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ motion is 22 granted in part and denied in part. 23 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff began her employment with Defendant XPO Logistics Freight, a global provider of transportation and logistics services, in July 2007, as a Freight Operations Supervisor. During her time with XPO, she held a variety of positions in many…