Hogg-Johnson

Hogg-Johnson v. Merz North America

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20203:20-cv-00884California2,067 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

|| P| NOV 2029 Pod CLERK US grag FS □□□ . SOUTHERN SIBIRICT OF GALIFOSMIA BY ee _ DEPUTY 6 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1i || ROBIN HOGG-JOHNSON, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00884-BEN-BLM Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

Vv. □ DISMISS □

14 || MERZ NORTH AMERICA, et al., Defendants.| [ECF No. 14] 16 Before the Court is Defendant Merz North America’s (“Merz”) Motion to Dismiss 18 || Plaintiff Robin Hogg-Johnson’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). ECF No. 14. For . 19 || the reasons that follow, the motion is granted. BACKGROUND!

Plaintiff Robin Hogg-Johnson was prescribed Belotero Balance, a prescription dermal filler manufactured by Merz that is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.