Ninteman
Ninteman v. The Dutra Group
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT NINTEMAN, Case No. 18-cv-1222-MMA (AGS)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO AMEND THE
SCHEDULING ORDER AND FOR
THE DUTRA GROUP and R.E. STAITE
LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH
ENGINEERING, INC.,
AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. 16 [Doc. No. 59] 17 18 19 20 Robert Ninteman (“Plaintiff”) brings this admiralty and maritime action against Defendants The Dutra Group (“Dutra”) and R.E. Staite Engineering, Inc. (“R.E. Staite”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiff moves for leave to amend the scheduling order and for leave to file a fourth amended complaint. See Doc. No. 59. The motion is unopposed. The Court found the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. See Doc. No. 62. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion. …