Ninteman

Ninteman v. The Dutra Group

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 27, 20203:18-cv-01222California2,001 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT NINTEMAN, Case No. 18-cv-1222-MMA (AGS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO AMEND THE

SCHEDULING ORDER AND FOR

THE DUTRA GROUP and R.E. STAITE

LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH

ENGINEERING, INC.,

AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. 16 [Doc. No. 59] 17 18 19 20 Robert Ninteman (“Plaintiff”) brings this admiralty and maritime action against Defendants The Dutra Group (“Dutra”) and R.E. Staite Engineering, Inc. (“R.E. Staite”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiff moves for leave to amend the scheduling order and for leave to file a fourth amended complaint. See Doc. No. 59. The motion is unopposed. The Court found the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. See Doc. No. 62. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.