Ward

Ward v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20203:17-cv-02371California800 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD WARD, Case No.: 17-CV-2371 W (WVG) 13-CV-2098 Plaintiff,

v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of U.S.C. § 406(b) [DOC. 23] Social Security Administration, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s counsel Young Cho’s (“Counsel”) motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. §406(b). Counsel requests an order granting him $24,060.00 in fees, with a credit to Plaintiff for the two EAJA fees previously paid in the amount of $8,600.00, netting a fee of $15,460. Plaintiff was served with the motion and notified that any response had to be filed within 14 days. (Notice of Mot. [Doc. 23] 2:4–17.) Defendant was also served with the motion. (Proof of Service [Doc. 23].) To date, neither Plaintiff nor Defendant have filed a response to Counsel’s attorney’s fee request. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted, and without oral argument. 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.