Vader

Vader v. Social Security Administration

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20203:19-cv-00703-AHGCalifornia9,391 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ROSE V., Case No.: 3:19-cv-703-AHG 11 Plaintiff,

ORDER RESOLVING PLAINTIFF’S

12 v. MOTION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW, REVERSING DENIAL OF ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of

BENEFITS, AND REMANDING FOR

Social Security , PAYMENT OF BENEFITS Defendant. 15 [ECF No. 20]

17 Plaintiff Rose V. (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on April 17, 2019, seeking review of 18 the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) denial of her application for 19 social security disability and supplemental security income benefits. ECF No. 1. The parties consented to proceed before a Magistrate Judge on April 29, 2019. ECF No. 5. Pursuant to the Court’s Order (ECF No. 17), Plaintiff filed her merits brief on February 5, 2020. ECF No. 20. The Commissioner timely filed his opposition brief on March 11, 2020. ECF No. 23. Plaintiff did not file a reply brief. The Court found this motion suitable for determination on the papers and, in accordance with Civil Local…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.