Gomez

Gomez v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20203:20-cv-02207California485 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 Anthony G., Case No.: 20cv2207-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING RENEWED

v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of

Social Security, 14 [ECF No. 8] Defendant. 15 On November 12, 2020, Plaintiff Anthony G. (“Plaintiff”) filed this social security appeal pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff filed a renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 8). For the reasons set forth herein, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP. All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $400. See U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed

26 1 In addition to the $350.00 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.