Anthony

Anthony v. San Diego Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20203:20-cv-02333California642 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRIAN KEITH ANTHONY Case No.: 20-CV-2333-CAB-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING APPLICATION

v. FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND

SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT et

DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT

al., PREJUDICE Defendants. [Doc. Nos. 2, 3] 13 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). “An affidavit in support of an IFP application is sufficient where it alleges that the affiant cannot pay the court costs and still afford the necessities of life.” Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir. 2015). “[A] plaintiff seeking IFP status must allege poverty with some particularity, definiteness and certainty.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). Here, Plaintiff’s application states that Plaintiff has a monthly income of $7,000.00, with monthly expenses of just $600.00. Because Plaintiff is able to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.