Tedesco
Tedesco v. Grand Brands, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY TEDESCO, on behalf of herself Case No.: 20-CV-1928 TWR (JLB) and all others similarly situated, and the 12 general public, ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF Plaintiff,
TIME TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF’S
14 v. COMPLAINT 15 GRAND BRANDS, INC., a Delaware (ECF No. 10) corporation, dba True Citrus or True Lemon, 17 Defendant. 18 On November 23, 2020, the Court struck Defendant Grand Brands, Inc.’s Answer to Plaintiff Mary Tedesco’s Complaint as untimely filed. (See ECF No. 9.) Defendant now moves, jointly with Plaintiff, for a retroactive extension of its deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, (see ECF No. 10 (“Joint Mot.”)), explaining that, “[f]ollowing the expiration of Defendant’s original time to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, counsel for the Parties conferred, determined an excusable error had occurred, and agreed Defendant would file its Answer as soon as practicable.” (Id. at 1.) Such stipulations…