Quesada

Quesada v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20203:19-cv-01280-KSCCalifornia7,267 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARQUITA MARIE Q., Case No.: 3:19-cv-01280-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of [Doc. Nos. 19, 22] Social Security, 15 Defendant.

On July 10, 2019, plaintiff Marquita Marie Q. (“plaintiff”) filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. Doc. No. 1. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), both parties consented to proceed before the undersigned Magistrate Judge. Doc. No. 7. Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Doc. Nos. 19, 22. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, DENIES defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and REMANDS the matter to the Social Security Administration (the “Administration”) for further proceedings as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.