Mitchell v. Chula Vista Parole

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENYATTA QUINN MITCHELL, Case No. 3:20-cv-919-MMA-AHG

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT vs. 14 CHULA VISTA PAROLE, [Doc. No. 14] 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”), has filed a “Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment” pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). See Doc. No. 14. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. I. Procedural History On May 15, 2020, Plaintiff filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging Defendant, “Chula Vista Parole” (CVP), failed to protect him from an individual who was on parole in Chula Vista, California. See Doc. No. 1. Plaintiff also filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), and a Motion to Appoint Counsel. See Doc. Nos. 2, 3. In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleged that an “individual” who was “a parolee…