Navarro
Williams v. Navarro
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 |} LANCE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 3:18-cv-01318-DMS-RBM CDCR #AG-2394, Plaintifg ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S "| MOTION FOR SANCTIONS □
OFFICER O. NAVARRO,
N.A. GARSILASO, E. ESTRADA,
16 || C. BAGNOL, F. LEWIS, L. HALL, ERATEALES KRIINIANS Tn Defendants. 19 20 I. INTRODUCTION Lance Williams (“Plaintiff”) is a California prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 23 || pauperis with a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. On October 22, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for sanctions (“Motion”) pursuant to ||FED. R. CIV. P. 11 related to Defendants’ conduct in filing a motion to dismiss portions of FAC. (Doc. 78; see also Doc. 65.) Although Plaintiff's Motion did not contain a |\|memorandum of points and authorities and likewise failed to include a hearing date, the |/undersigned …