Stevenson

Stevenson v. Beard

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20203:16-cv-03079California1,944 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 .

5 . .

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA .

|| STEVIE J. STEVENSON, Case No.: 3:16-cv-3079-TWR-RBM _— Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 13 || V. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL || JEFFREY BEARD, Ph.D., et al, □ is Defendants.| [Doc. 131] . I. INTRODUCTION ©

Stevie J. Stevenson (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 19 || filed a “Motion for Appointment of Counsel or Appointment of Investigator to Assist ||Plaintiff....” (Doc. 131.) Liberally construing this filing, it is a Motion for Appointment 21 || of Counsel (“Motion”). (See Doc. 131 at 1, 6-7); see Blaisdell v. Frappiea, 729 F.3d 1237, 22 || 1241 (9th Cir. 2013) (courts liberally construe pro se litigants? filings, relieving them from strict application of procedural rules and demands). For the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.