McGraw

McGraw v. Pacifica Ashwood LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20203:20-cv-00954California231 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 |} RANDALL SCOTT MCGRAW, Case No. 20-cv-954-MMA (KSC) Plants ORDER GRANTING JOINT 11 || Vv. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 12 || PACIFICA ASHWOOD LLC, FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendant.| [Doc. No. 47] 14 15 Randall Scott McGraw (‘Plaintiff’) and Pacifica Ashwood LLC (‘‘Pacifica’’) ||(collectively, “the parties”) jointly move for leave to allow Plaintiff to file a First || Amended Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2). See ||Doc. No. 47. Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the parties’ joint motion. ||Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to file Plaintiff's FAC (Doc. No. ||47- at 3-16) as a separate docket entry. Pursuant to the parties’ motion, Pacifica’s Answer to the original Complaint is deemed to be its Answer to the FAC. See Doc. No. ||47 at 2; see also KST Data, Inc. v. DXC Tech. Co., 980 F.3d 709, 715…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.