D.C.
D.C. v. County of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 D.C., a minor by and through his Case No.: 15-cv-1868-MMA (NLS) Guardian Ad Litem, Helen Garter, on behalf of himself and all others similarly ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S situated, EX PARTE MOTION FOR
PERMISSION TO FILE SUR-REPLY
13 Plaintiff, [Doc. No. 115] v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 16 Defendants.
18 On November 11, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a second amended 19 complaint. See Doc. No. 108. Defendant County of San Diego (the “County”) opposed, 20 to which Plaintiff replied. See Doc. Nos. 109, 113. The County now requests permission 21 to file a sur-reply. See Doc. No. 115. Plaintiff opposes the motion. See Doc. No. 116. 22 The Local Rules do not authorize the filing of a sur-reply. See generally CivLR 23 7.1. That said, District Courts have the discretion to either permit or preclude the filing 24 of a sur-reply upon request. See Johnson v. Wennes, No. 08-CV-1798-L (JMA), 2009 25 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36992, 2009 WL 1161620, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2009). Such 26 discretion…