Grano
Grano v. Sodexo, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 Case Nos.: 18cv1818-TWR(BLM) VINCENT GRANO, et al.,
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO DETERMINE
v. SUFFICIENCY OF CARGILL’S
RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND
SODEXO MANAGEMENT, INC., et al.,
REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
Defendants. [ECF NO. 240] ____________________________________
AND RELATED CASES
17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ November 4, 2020 Motion to Determine Sufficiency of Cargill’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Second Requests for Admission [ECF No. 240-1 (“Mot.”)], Defendant Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.’s November 18, 2020 opposition to the motion [ECF No. 245 (“Oppo.”)], and Plaintiffs’ November 24, 2020 reply [ECF No. 250 (“Reply”)]. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED IN PART. DISCOVERY RELATED BACKGROUND On September 10, 2020, Plaintiffs served their Second Requests for Admission (“RFA”) on Defendant Cargill.…