Grano

Grano v. Sodexo, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20203:18-cv-01818California3,403 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 Case Nos.: 18cv1818-TWR(BLM) VINCENT GRANO, et al.,

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO DETERMINE

v. SUFFICIENCY OF CARGILL’S

RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND

SODEXO MANAGEMENT, INC., et al.,

REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

Defendants. [ECF NO. 240] ____________________________________

AND RELATED CASES

17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ November 4, 2020 Motion to Determine Sufficiency of Cargill’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Second Requests for Admission [ECF No. 240-1 (“Mot.”)], Defendant Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.’s November 18, 2020 opposition to the motion [ECF No. 245 (“Oppo.”)], and Plaintiffs’ November 24, 2020 reply [ECF No. 250 (“Reply”)]. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED IN PART. DISCOVERY RELATED BACKGROUND On September 10, 2020, Plaintiffs served their Second Requests for Admission (“RFA”) on Defendant Cargill.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.