Kamal

Kamal v. Eden Creamery, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20203:18-cv-01298California6,413 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YOUSSIF KAMAL, GILLIAN NEELY, Case No.: 18-CV-1298 TWR (AGS)

RICHARD LICHTEN, SUSAN COX,

NICK TOVAR, MICHELE KINMAN, ORDER: (1) DENYING WITHOUT

ASHLEY PETEFISH, and TERRI PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION BROWN, on their own behalf and on TO FILE UNDER SEAL, 14 behalf of all others similarly situated, (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A Plaintiffs,

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT,

16 v. AND (3) SETTING HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS EDEN CREAMERY, LLC, dba HALO

CERTIFICATION

TOP CREAMERY, and JUSTIN T.

WOOLVERTON,

(ECF Nos. 77, 78, 79, 82, 87) Defendants.

Presently before the Court are Plaintiffs Youssif Kamal, Gillian Neely, Richard Lichten, Susan Cox, Nick Tovar, Michele Kinman, Ashley Petefish, and Teri Brown’s Motions (1) to File Portions of Documents Conditionally Under Seal (“Mot. to Seal,” ECF No. 77), (2) for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.