Kendall

Kendall v. Odonate Therapeutics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20203:20-cv-01828California1,970 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 KEVIN KENDALL, individually and on Case No.: 3:20-cv-01828-H-LL behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

Plaintiff, APPOINTMENT AS LEAD v. PLAINTIFF AND APPROVAL OF

SELECTION OF LEAD COUNSEL

ODONATE THERAPEUTICS, INC.,

KEVIN C. TANG, MICHAEL HEARNE,

[Doc. No. 3.] and JOHN G. LEMKEY, Defendants. 19 On November 16, 2020, Plaintiff Kevin Kendall (“Kendall”) filed a motion for 20 appointment as lead plaintiff and approval of his selection of lead counsel. (Doc. No. 3.) 21 On December 10, 2020 Defendants Odonate Therapeutics, Inc., Kevin C. Tang, Michael 22 Hearne, and John G. Lemkey filed a notice of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s motion. (Doc. 23 No. 10.) No competing motions have been filed. A hearing on the matter is currently 24 scheduled for December 21, 2020 at 10:30 a.m. The Court, pursuant to its discretion under 25 the Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), determines the matter is appropriate for resolution without oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.