Stewart

Stewart v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20203:19-cv-02043California801 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAMELA STEWART and ZULEKHA Case No.: 19-CV-2043 TWR (KSC) ABDUL, individually and on behalf of 12 similarly situated employees of ORDER DENYING WITHOUT Defendants in the State of California PREJUDICE MOTION TO FILE

DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

Plaintiffs,

v. (ECF Nos. 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 58) QUEST DIAGNOSTICS CLINICAL LABORATORIES, INC. and DOES I 17 THROUGH 50, inclusive, 18 Defendants.

20 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Pamela Stewart’s unopposed Motion to File 21 Documents Under Seal in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification (“Mot,” 22 ECF No. 58). Having carefully reviewed Plaintiff’s arguments, the proposed sealed 23 documents (ECF Nos. 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53), and the 24 law, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Motion as follows. 25 “[T]he courts of this country recognize a general right to inspect and copy public 26 records and documents, including…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.