Do
Do v. Tri City Healthcare District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIKE DO, Case No.: 19cv2253-MSB(NLS)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
v. FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED
COMPLAINT
TRI CITY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT, dba TRI
CITY MEDICAL CENTER, et al., [ECF NOS. 26, 28, 35] Defendants. 16 17 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Third Amended 19 Complaint (“Motion”). (See ECF Nos. 26, 28, 35.) For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the Motion.
22 Plaintiff incorrectly titled his Motion filed on September 22, 2020, as a “Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint to Add Defendants.” (ECF No. 26 at 1.) On September 24, 2020, Plaintiff clarified 24 in his “Amended Notice of Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint” that he was seeking to add an additional claim and not additional defendants. (See ECF No. 28.) Further, in his September 22, 2020 Motion, Plaintiff failed to attach a version of the…