Petersen
Petersen v. California Department of Correction & Rehab.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN PETERSEN, CDCR #BC-2040, Case No.: 18-CV-2473 JLS (MSB)
ORDER (1) GRANTING
Plaintiff, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO vs. DISMISS AND (2) ORDERING
PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT
WHY UNSERVED DEFENDANTS
OF CORRECTIONS &
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
REHABILITATION, et al.,
Defendants. (ECF No. 16)
Presently before the Court is Defendants M. Deel, J. Silva, B. Martin (collectively, the “Doctor Defendants”), and E. Velasco’s (all together, “Moving Defendants”)1 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 16). Plaintiff has not filed a response to Moving Defendants’ Motion. The Court took this matter under
24 1 Although Plaintiff also brings claims against the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, those defendants have not been properly served, see ECF Nos.…