Carroll

Carroll v. Toele

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20203:20-cv-00079California595 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TREMAYNE CARROLL, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00079-BAS-RBM

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

vs. MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL AS MOOT [ECF No. 20] AND C/O TOELE, et al.,

GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE

Defendants. THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 17 Pending before the Court is a Motion filed by Plaintiff Tremayne Carroll, requesting “Appointment of Counsel and/or [to] Compel RJD/CDCR to Give Access to All Reports.” See Pl.’s Mot., ECF No. 20 at 1. Carroll filed the motion pro se but has since retained counsel, who has filed a Notice of Appearance and valid substitution on Plaintiff’s behalf. (See ECF No. 23; Civ. L.R. 83.3(f)(2).) Plaintiff’s previously-filed motion is therefore moot. The Court further notes that Plaintiff has already amended his pleading twice: once as a matter of course pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1) in response to this Court’s June 25, 2020 comprehensive initial screening Order, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.