Petconnect Rescue, Inc. v. Salinas

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20203:20-cv-00527California644 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 PETCONNECT RESCUE, INC., a Case No.: 3:20-cv-00527-H-DEB Maryland corporation; LUCKY PUP 19 DOG RESCUE.COM, a California ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ corporation; and SARAH GONZALEZ, MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A an individual, SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs, [Doc. No. 85.] v.

DAVID SALINAS, an individual, et al., 24 Defendants.

On October 30, 2020, Plaintiffs PetConnect Rescue, Inc., Lucky Pup Dog Rescue.com, and Sarah Gonzalez (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a motion requesting leave to file a second amended complaint (the “SAC”). (Doc. No. 85.) Plaintiffs’ motion was not opposed by any party in this action. In fact, on December 9, 2020, Defendants David Salinas, Veronica Salinas, Richard Robles Pena, Virgo Castro Zusa, The Puppy Store, LLC, Yellow Store Enterprises, LLC, Socal Puppy Adoptions, Inc., Pet Connect Rescue, Inc., Alysia Rothman, Ray Rothman, The Fancy Puppy, LLC, The Puppy Store…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.