Diaz

Cummings v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20203:20-cv-01020California2,447 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD MAURICE CUMMINGS, Case No.: 3:20-cv-01020 CAB-WVG

CDCR #AF-0209,

ORDER DISMISSING FIRST

Plaintiff, AMENDED COMPLAINT [ECF No. vs. 5] WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

FOR FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

RALPH DIAZ, Sec. of the CDCR; PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) DANIEL PARAMO, Warden; C. & 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) COVEL, Assoc. Warden; M. KEENER, Sergeant; BONAFICIO, Corrections 17 Officer, DOES 1-100, Defendants. 19 20 21 Edward Cummings (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at Mule Creek State Prison (“MCSP”) located in Ione, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), nor did he file a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) when he filed his Complaint, and the Court dismissed the action on June 9, 2020 for that reason.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.