Securities and Exchange Commission v. Blockvest, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20203:18-cv-02287California4,782 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No.: 18CV2287-GPB(MSB)

COMMISSION,

AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT

Plaintiff, AGAINST DEFENDANTS v. BLOCKVEST, LLC and REGINALD 14 BUDDY RINGGOLD, III a/k/a BLOCKVEST, LLC and REGINALD RASOOL ABDUL RAHIM EL BUDDY RINGGOLD, III a/k/a RASOOL ABDUL RAHIM EL, Defendants. 18 Pursuant to the SEC’s ex parte motion to correct the final judgment filed on December 10, 2020, the Court grants the ex parte motion and files an amended final judgment to correct two errors that were a result of clerical mistakes or oversight pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a). (Dkt. No. 133.) Before the Court is Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) motion for permanent injunction and monetary relief based on the default judgments entered against Defendants Blockvest, LLC (“Blockvest”), (Dkt. No. 128), and Reginald Buddy Ringgold,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.