Finjan LLC v. ESET, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20203:17-cv-00183California3,526 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FINJAN, INC., Case No.: 17CV183 CAB (BGS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY AND

ESET, LLC and ESET SPOL. S.R.O.,

ISSUANCE OF LETTER OF

Defendants. REQUEST

16 [ECF 833] 17 I. INTRODUCTION Defendants Eset, spol. s.r.o. and Eset, LLC (“Eset”) has filed this motion to permit a second deposition of Shlomo Touboul. (ECF 833.) Mr. Touboul’s first deposition occurred when the case was stayed as to one of the six patents asserted in this case, U.S. Patent No. 7,975,305 (“’305 Patent”). (Id. at 2.1) Eset now seeks a second deposition to depose him regarding the ’305 Patent. (Id. at 3-5.) Eset also seeks issuance of a Letter of Request pursuant to the Hague Convention because Mr. Touboul is in Israel. (Id., Ex. A.) Finjan is opposed to a second deposition. (ECF 834.) Finjan argues Eset should have 26 27 28 questioned Mr. Touboul…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.