Cota

Cota v. Ben Bridge-Jeweler, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20203:20-cv-01496California1,053 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULISSA COTA Case No.: 20cv1496-LAB (RBB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

v. MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO ANSWER; AND

BEN BRIDGE-JEWELER, INC.

Defendant. ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE MOTION TO

STRIKE

17 [DOCKET NUMBERS 4, 5, 8.]

19 Plaintiff brought this putative class action, bringing claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and supplemental state law claims. Plaintiff asks the Court to compel Defendant to upgrade its website to be accessible to blind and visually impaired people. The joint motions for extension of time to answer (Docket nos. 4 and 5) are GRANTED, and the answer is accepted as filed. On December 14, Plaintiff filed a motion to strike around twenty of the answer’s defenses. The motion describes them all as affirmative defenses, although most of them are not. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c)(1) (listing affirmative defenses). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.