Valdez

Richardson v. Valdez

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20203:20-cv-01760California2,440 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONN RICHARDSON Case No.: 20-cv-01760-BAS-JLB CDCR # AC9306,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, (1) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR v. FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §

O. VALDEZ “LT.” S.H.O., 1915(e)(2) & 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b);

E. CHAVARRIA “AW”, C.O.O.,

AND Defendants.

(2) DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

[ECF No. 2] AS MOOT 18 Donn Richardson (“Richardson” or “Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”) located in Crescent City, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (See Compl., ECF No. 1; Mot. to Proceed IFP, ECF No. 2.) On December 7, 2020, Richardson paid the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). (See ECF No. 3.) I. SCREENING…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.