Grady

Grady v. Alonzo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20203:20-cv-01273California5,120 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MITCHELL QUINTIN GRADY, Case No. 3:20cv1273-MMA-WVG

CDCR #AS-8775

ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS

Plaintiff, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) vs. AND 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b);

DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO MARIO ALONZO, et al., EFFECT SERVICE UPON 16 Defendants. DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) AND FED. R. CIV. P. 4(c)(3) 18 19 Plaintiff Mitchell Quintin Grady, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at Kern Valley State Prison and proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleges that five officials at Centinela State Prison, where he was formerly incarcerated, violated his rights in connection with an altercation that occurred in February 2020. See generally Doc. No. 10; see also Doc. No. 12 (notice of change of address). The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.