Kirschner

Kirschner v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20203:20-cv-01712California2,803 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARC S. KIRSCHNER, Case No.: 20-cv-01712-LAB-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL

v. COMPLIANCE WITH OUT-OF-

DISTRICT SUBPOENA

J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et

al., 15 Defendants.

[ECF No. 1]

18 Before the Court is Plaintiff Marc S. Kirschner’s Motion to Compel. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff seeks to compel Third Party Vantage Point Advisors, Inc.’s (“Vantage Point”) to produce documents in response to a subpoena deuces tecum served on Vantage Point in an action pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (“Delaware Bankruptcy Court”), Kirschner v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al., Adv. Pro. 17-51840-LSS (Bankr. D. Del.). Plaintiff also seeks reasonable expenses and attorneys’ fees in bringing the instant motion. (Id. at 8.) The Court construes Plaintiff’s request as a request for contempt sanctions. For the reasons…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.