Kideckel

Kideckel v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20203:20-cv-00681California896 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRENT KIDECKEL, Case No.: 20-cv-00681-DMS (JLB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE SHOW CAUSE

v. HEARING AND IMPOSING

SANCTIONS

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Defendant. [ECF Nos. 30, 32] 16 17 On June 11, 2020, the Court set a Mandatory Settlement Conference (“MSC”) in this matter for December 8, 2020. (ECF No. 12.) On August 11, 2020, due to a conflict with the Court’s criminal calendar, the Court reset the MSC for a Zoom video conference on December 1, 2020, at 1:45 PM. (ECF No. 18.) After Plaintiff Brent Kideckel (“Plaintiff”) failed to lodge his Court-ordered confidential settlement statement by the Court-ordered deadline of November 19, 2020 (id. at 4), the Court issued a Minute Order on November 24, 2020, requiring that the confidential settlement statement be submitted by November 30, 2020 and reminding Plaintiff of the upcoming MSC (ECF No. 28). The Court did not receive the statement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.