Barajas Centeno v. City of Carlsbad
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20203:19-cv-02098California589 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JOSE LUIS BARAJAS CENTENO, Case No.: 3:19-cv-02098-L-DEB
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v.
MOTIONS:
CITY OF CARLSBAD; JORDAN WALKER; and DOES 1 through 10, (1) FOR TIME TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY [DKT. NO. 66-1]; Defendants. AND
(2) TO COMPEL DEFENDANTS
TO PAY EXPERT
DEPOSITION COSTS [DKT.
NO. 73]
Before Court are two motions by Plaintiff: (1) a Motion for Time to Conduct Discovery, which was mis-filed as an attachment to Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions Against Defendants and Defendants’ Counsel, Dkt. No. 66-2; and (2) a Motion for Order to Compel Defendants to Pay Expert’s Deposition, Transcripts, and Spanish/English Translators and Expert’s Travel Time. Dkt. No. 73. Defendants
28 oppose both motions. Dkt. Nos. 68, 85.
I. Motion for Additional Time to Conduct Discovery
2 The deadline for completion of fact…