Barajas Centeno v. City of Carlsbad

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20203:19-cv-02098California589 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE LUIS BARAJAS CENTENO, Case No.: 3:19-cv-02098-L-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v.

MOTIONS:

CITY OF CARLSBAD; JORDAN WALKER; and DOES 1 through 10, (1) FOR TIME TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY [DKT. NO. 66-1]; Defendants. AND

(2) TO COMPEL DEFENDANTS

TO PAY EXPERT

DEPOSITION COSTS [DKT.

NO. 73]

Before Court are two motions by Plaintiff: (1) a Motion for Time to Conduct Discovery, which was mis-filed as an attachment to Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions Against Defendants and Defendants’ Counsel, Dkt. No. 66-2; and (2) a Motion for Order to Compel Defendants to Pay Expert’s Deposition, Transcripts, and Spanish/English Translators and Expert’s Travel Time. Dkt. No. 73. Defendants

28 oppose both motions. Dkt. Nos. 68, 85.

I. Motion for Additional Time to Conduct Discovery

2 The deadline for completion of fact…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.