Vance

Vance v. Berkshire Hathaway Life Insurance Company of Nebraska

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20213:20-cv-01480California571 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 TERA VANCE, an individual, Case No.: 3:20-cv-01480-BEN-KSC Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED

v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY LIFE

INSURANCE COMPANY OF

NEBRASKA, an entity, and KRISTIN [ECF No. 13] BARNETT, an individual, Defendants. 17 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Tera Vance’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Leave to Amend to Add a Party Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. ECF No. 13. Defendant Berkshire Hathaway Life Insurance Company of Nebraska (“BHLN”) filed a Response to the Motion indicating it did not oppose Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend, but only as to “those claims that survived the original Motion to Dismiss.” Response, ECF No. 16, 2. Defendant Kirstin Barnett did not file a Response, and Plaintiff did not file any reply. The Motion is now ripe for determination. I. LEGAL STANDARD…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.