Baxter Healthcare Corporation v. Becton, Dickinson, and Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20213:17-cv-02186California2,883 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BAXTER HEALTHCARE Case No.: 3:17-cv-2186 JLS-RBB CORPORATION and BAXTER

CORPORATION ENGLEWOOD, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

LIFT STAY AS TO U.S. PATENT

NO. 8,554,579

Plaintiffs,

v. (ECF No. 72)

BECTON, DICKINSON AND

COMPANY 18 Defendant.

Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Baxter Healthcare Corporation and Baxter Healthcare Englewood’s Motion to Lift Stay Regarding U.S. Patent No. 8,554,579. (“Mot.,” ECF No. 72). Also before the Court is Defendant Becton, Dickinson and Company’s Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 73) and Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of the Motion, (“Reply,” ECF No. 76). The Court took this matter under submission without oral argument. See generally ECF No. 77. Having carefully considered the Parties’ arguments and the relevant law, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion to Lift Stay.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.