Kula
Williams v. Kula
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20203:20-cv-01120California6,101 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS and Case No.: 20-CV-1120 TWR (AHG)
LEGACY GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT
LLC, ORDER (1) GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO Plaintiffs,
DISMISS FOR LACK OF
14 v. PERSONAL JURISDICTION, (2) DISMISSING WITHOUT
THOMAS KULA; JOANNE KULA;
PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’
ELIZABETH DIAZ; KATHI OSTEEN;
VERIFIED COMPLAINT, AND
STEPHEN HONEYBILL; LINDSEY
(3) DENYING AS MOOT
STEWART; THERESA RAGLEN;
DEFENDANTS’ ANTI-SLAPP
ROGER “ARI” KAHN; and DOES 1-20,
MOTIONS
Defendants. (ECF Nos. 1, 3, 14–19, 46)
Presently before the Court are the fully briefed Special Motions to Strike (CCP § 425.16) or, Alternatively, Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction filed by Defendants Roger “Ari” Kahn (ECF No. 3), Elizabeth Diaz (ECF No. 14), Stephen Honeybill (ECF No. 15), Kathi Osteen (ECF…