Kula

Williams v. Kula

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20203:20-cv-01120California6,101 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS and Case No.: 20-CV-1120 TWR (AHG)

LEGACY GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT

LLC, ORDER (1) GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO Plaintiffs,

DISMISS FOR LACK OF

14 v. PERSONAL JURISDICTION, (2) DISMISSING WITHOUT

THOMAS KULA; JOANNE KULA;

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’

ELIZABETH DIAZ; KATHI OSTEEN;

VERIFIED COMPLAINT, AND

STEPHEN HONEYBILL; LINDSEY

(3) DENYING AS MOOT

STEWART; THERESA RAGLEN;

DEFENDANTS’ ANTI-SLAPP

ROGER “ARI” KAHN; and DOES 1-20,

MOTIONS

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 1, 3, 14–19, 46)

Presently before the Court are the fully briefed Special Motions to Strike (CCP § 425.16) or, Alternatively, Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction filed by Defendants Roger “Ari” Kahn (ECF No. 3), Elizabeth Diaz (ECF No. 14), Stephen Honeybill (ECF No. 15), Kathi Osteen (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.