Dang

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH DANG d/b/a LAW OFFICE OF Case No.: 19CV1519-GPC(AHG) JOSEPH DANG, an individual,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART v. COUNTERDEFENDANT DANG’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

DAVID PONTIER, an individual; JUDGMENT AND DENYING TEOCO Corporation Group Benefit Plan,

COUNTERPLAINTIFF PONTIER’S

a self-funded group health plan; TEOCO

AMENDED MOTION FOR

Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; SUMMARY JUDGMENT UMR Inc., a Delaware Corporation; Glenn

C. Nusbaum, an individual; Paul E. Kim, [Dkt. Nos. 74, 118.] MD Inc., A California corporation; Kevin 19 Yoo, an individual, 20 Defendants.

22 Before the Court is Counterdefendant Joseph Dang’s (“Dang”) motion for 23 summary judgment on the counterclaims, and Counterplaintiff David Pontier’s 24 (“Pontier”) amended motion for summary judgment on certain claims. (Dkt. Nos. 74, 25 118.) Oppositions and replies were filed.1 …