Valdez

Richardson v. Valdez

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20213:20-cv-01760California717 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DONN RICHARDSON Case No.: 20-cv-01760-BAS-JLB CDCR # AC9306,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

Plaintiff, LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED v. COMPLAINT AS MOOT O. VALDEZ “LT.” S.H.O., (ECF No. 6)

E. CHAVARRIA “AW”, C.O.O.,

10 Defendants. 11 Donn Richardson (“Richardson” or “Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”) located in Crescent City, California, and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on September 9, 2020. (See Compl., ECF No. 1; Mot. for IFP, ECF No. 2.) On December 7, 2020, Richardson paid the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). (See ECF No. 3.) On December 17, 2020, the Court screened the Complaint as required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b) and dismissed it because Plaintiff had failed to state a plausible Eighth Amendment claim upon which § 1983 relief could be granted, see…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.