Paul

Johnson v. Paul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20213:20-cv-02174California449 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CLARANCE D. JOHNSON, Case No.: 20-CV-2174-JLS (WVG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION

v. FOR DEFAULT, (2) DISMISSING ACTION POPE FRANCIS PAUL, et al.,

WITH PREJUDICE, AND

Defendants. (3) CLOSING CASE

15 (ECF No. 14)

17 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Clarance D. Johnson’s Motion for Default (“Mot.,” ECF No. 14). Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). See ECF Nos. 1, 2. The Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP and screened Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See ECF No. 9. The Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted on November 20, 2020. Id. (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)). The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days, warning that failure to do so would result in a final order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.