Anh Van Thai v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20203:15-cv-00583California1,846 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MOHAMMAD NASSIRI, DIEP THI Case No.: 15-cv-583-WQH-NLS

NGUYEN, ANH VAN THAI, DUC

HUYNH, TRAI CHAU, HOI CUU QUAN ORDER

NHAN VNCH, and ROES 1-100, on behalf of themselves and all others 13 similarly situated, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DUKE

(DUC) TRAN; SSA-AGENT DOES 1-20;

STATE AND/OR LOCAL AGENTS CDI

DOES 21-40; MARY HAGER,

Supervisor; NICHOLAS PILCHER, SSA Agent; SUNDEEP PATEL, SSA Agent; 20 WILLIAM VILLASENOR; and DULCE SANCHEZ, Defendants. 23 HAYES, Judge: 24 The matter before the Court is the Motion for Leave to Amend Class Action 25 Complaint filed by Plaintiff Anh Thai. (ECF No. 172). 26 /// 27 /// 28 I. BACKGROUND On March 14, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a Class Action Complaint against the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), the Social Security Administration (“SSA”), and individual and Doe SSA agents. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiffs brought federal and state law claims …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.