Carroll
Carroll v. California Department of Corrections
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 ABONILICO CARROLL, Case No.: 3:19-cv-2126-BAS-KSC
14 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF
COUNSEL
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al., [Doc. No. 33] Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff Abonilico Carroll is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging defendants violated his rights under the United States Constitution. See Doc. No. 1. Before the Court is plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (“Motion” or “Mot.”). Doc. No. 33. For the reasons set forth below, the plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. / / / / / / / / I. BACKGROUND On November 5, 2019, plaintiff filed this action, alleging that defendants violated his rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. See Doc. No. 1 at 3-5. Plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed for failure to either pay…