Acedo

Acedo v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20213:17-cv-02592California1,014 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL ACEDO, Case No.: 17-CV-2592 JLS (JLB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. REMAND

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; PAUL (ECF No. 93)

RICHARDS; CARLOS OLMEDA;

CAROLYN COLVIN; CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF VITAL

STATISTICS; CALIFORNIA

DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL SERVICES;

DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT

19 SERVICES; and BOARD OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendants. 22 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Daniel Acedo’s Motion to Reinstate and Remand to State Court (“Mot.,” ECF No. 93). Plaintiff seeks to have this case remanded to state court three years after it was removed by Defendants based on federal question jurisdiction. (“Notice of Removal” at 4, ECF No. 1.) Since removal, this Court has dismissed Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, and Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal. (See /// ECF No. 83; “Notice of Appeal,” ECF No. 87.) For the following reasons, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.