Shaw

Shaw v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20213:20-cv-01875California838 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAUN REGINALD SHAW, Case No.: 20-cv-1875-GPC (DEB)

Petitioner,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING PETITIONER’S STU SHERMAN, et al.,

MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF

Respondents. TIME; AND (2) DENYING PETITIONER’S

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL

18 [DKT. NOS. 6, 9] 19 Before the Court are Petitioner Shaun Reginald Shaw’s Motions for Enlargement of Time and Appointment of Counsel. Dkt. Nos. 6, 9. Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis on a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Petition”). Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS in part Petitioner’s Motion for Enlargement of Time to file a traverse. Petitioner may file a traverse on or before March 5, 2021. The Court DENIES Petitioner’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel without prejudice. 28 Petitioner requests appointment of counsel because he: (1) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.