Roberts

Roberts v. Solari Enterprise Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20213:20-cv-02476California1,160 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TINA LOUISE ROBERTS and TONY Case No.: 20-cv-2476-JLS (BLM)

LEE-VANT WRIGHT,

ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiffs, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; v. (2) DISMISSING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’

SOLARI ENTERPRISE INC. and COMPLAINT; AND (3) DENYING

FEDEX.COM,

MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL

16 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 1, 2, 3) 17 18 Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Tina Louise Roberts and Tony Lee-Vant Wright’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (IFP Mot., ECF No. 2) and Motion to Appoint Counsel (ECF No. 3). Plaintiffs appear to be asserting fraud and personal injury claims stemming from Defendant Fedex.com’s alleged loss of a package. IFP MOTION All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of /// /// /// 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.