Roberts
Roberts v. Solari Enterprise Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TINA LOUISE ROBERTS and TONY Case No.: 20-cv-2476-JLS (BLM)
LEE-VANT WRIGHT,
ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION TO
Plaintiffs, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; v. (2) DISMISSING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’
SOLARI ENTERPRISE INC. and COMPLAINT; AND (3) DENYING
FEDEX.COM,
MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL
16 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 1, 2, 3) 17 18 Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Tina Louise Roberts and Tony Lee-Vant Wright’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (IFP Mot., ECF No. 2) and Motion to Appoint Counsel (ECF No. 3). Plaintiffs appear to be asserting fraud and personal injury claims stemming from Defendant Fedex.com’s alleged loss of a package. IFP MOTION All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of /// /// /// 1 …